2.5 Stars - Recommended Lightly
Pages: 336
Publisher: Pegasus Books
Release: October 10, 2013
Guest review by Drew Broussard
The
Short Version: Julia, a college
freshman, mostly keeps to herself - there was a terrible accident the year
before, for which she feels responsible, and her life has somewhat shattered
because of it. But her roommate likes to gossip and she meets a charming,
if quiet boy in her music class and so she gets along pretty well - until she
meets Sam, a man who works at a lunch place off-campus. No one is quite
who they seem and none of them will ever be the same after that fateful fall
semester...
The
Review: I really wish I didn't have to bring up Gone Girl in relation to this
book - but I feel like that is, unfortunately, our lot as readers for the next
few years at least. That book, for better or worse (and I'd pick the
former), has established itself as the surprise-blockbuster that now everyone
wants to copy. Which is not to say that this book copies it - but I don't know that we'd be reading The
Preservationist without Gillian
Flynn having found such success. That said, the double cross and the
unreliable narrator - especially in
mysteries - are tropes as old as time, so maybe we would. But it feels
undeniably a kindred spirit and I think (again, for better or worse) this book
suffers for the comparison.
First of
all, it's written in that breathless style of modern thrillers - Dan Brown and
Michael Crichton fans know what I'm talking about, with the short chapters that
end with a cliffhanger that basically forces you to keep reading. There are
three points of view here - Julia's, Marcus', and Sam's. But Marcus only
gets a few chapters to himself and most of the time he just seems a little
weird - so I don't think it's a stretch to call Julia and Sam the main
characters. Things mostly flip back and forth between them and it's not
hard to tell from the very get-go that something is definitely not right with
Sam. But then you also start to wonder if something is not right with
Marcus. And then there's even a further possibility dropped into the mix
- and, I'll give Kramon this, the tension sure does rise.
I'm going
to try to avoid spoilers - especially since this is an advance review - but
it's hard to talk about a book like this, that depends so much on plot, without
at least making overtures towards a few things. For example, I think
Kramon could've put together a stronger book had he not fallen back on clichés
and tropes at the end - if he'd, instead, followed up with the "....no, it
couldn't be" possibility that he drops in our laps midway through and then
ignores/gets bored with. Because there's very little that is 'original'
about this book. These characters are all pretty stock-and-trade in
today's fiction - down to the stupid main character, at whom you want to shout
things like you would at a movie screen. She does that level of stupid stuff.
Of course, here's the catch: this book is set at a rural college in central PA. And, not to be terribly rude or anything, but I know plenty of people who went to rural colleges in central PA - and some of those girls, as freshmen, might well've done exactly what Julia does here. Take that as you will, I suppose.
Of course, here's the catch: this book is set at a rural college in central PA. And, not to be terribly rude or anything, but I know plenty of people who went to rural colleges in central PA - and some of those girls, as freshmen, might well've done exactly what Julia does here. Take that as you will, I suppose.
But anyway
the thing is, even the quirks of characters like Sam feel highlighted,
capitalized, drawn with the big brush. I not only didn't care about any
of them, particularly, but they did nothing to try and make me care about them.
The dialogue is flat most of the time, without any affect, and the quirks
/ Things That Happened in their pasts seemed almost entirely unnecessary, other
than to provide Background and Explain Some Things About The Character In
Question. Look elsewhere for characters - the issue with this book comes
down to plot.
Again, I'm
not going to really go into things, plot-wise. I'd rather be a good
sport, especially considering the book's only just coming out now. Did I
flip through it pretty damn fast towards the end? I did. But did I
feel anything, at all, when I put it down? I did not. I barely
remember the characters' names and I finished the book less than an hour ago -
that's how quickly it's all fading from my mind (and not due to any
degenerative illness that might someday make me an unreliable narrator, although thank you for
your concern).
Rating: 2.5 out of 5. My
issues with the writing aside, the book reads at a gallop and the end does get
your heart racing a bit as the pot boils over. But I just can't find
anything that particularly distinguishes this book from any other in the genre,
in any way. By the time the subterfuge is revealed, you're pretty much
saying "I told you so" and the book devolves into 75 or so pages of
"now how's this all going to play out?" action - and your opinion of
the book will most likely rely on whether or not you're looking for such a
simple diversion, or if you're a fan of the genre anyway.
Drew Broussard reads, a lot. When not doing that, he's writing stories or playing music or acting or producing or coming up with other ways to make trouble. He also has a day job at The Public Theater in New York City.
No comments:
Post a Comment