3 Stars - Recommended to fans of experimental literature
Pages: 270
Publisher: Black Coffee Press
Released 2012
Pages: 270
Publisher: Black Coffee Press
Released 2012
Guest reviewed by Kelsey Lueptow
Seb Doubinsky’s book Goodbye Babylon is a postmodern,
experimental story with some fluctuating aspects of absurdism. It challenges
historical and contemporary beliefs regarding literature, war, systems of
ideology, and other power structures. As Michael Moorhead mentions in the
introduction, “Seb Doubinsky . . . has an enthusiasm for the ridiculous.” That
simple line breathes light on the instant and constant shock of form and
content.
The most notable and enjoyable aspect of this novel is its
shape-shifting form. At first glance from font to margins and chapters, this
seems chaotic and unruly. In fact, the opposite turns out to be true. It is
split into three sections with some unique storylines, characters, grammatical
rules, and narrative games to different parts. Section one dips the toe into
the stylistic realm of this book. It introduces wide margins, very short
sub-chapters within longer divisions, and braided narrative perspectives that
are unique but normal within the confines of this literary experience. At first
it feels jarring, but then the rhythm sets in. Entering into the quirky style
of this book also baptizes you into the world where dogs turn to fish, Wile E.
Coyote is a psycho killer, and all the men are misogynists.
The physical absurdism of the first section comes from a
protean, self-aware K-9 narrator woven into the mix; even more pervasive and absurd,
however, is the terrifying misogyny in the male character’s voices. The only
woman with a voice, a perspective, a purpose in life beyond serving men is, of
course, the lesbian bitch Sheryl. Absurd. Even the dog hates the woman who
embarrasses him by not letting him finish on her leg. The men habitually
objectify and degrade the women around them—all the women around them. Through
declarations of love, lust, and admiration, these same men demonstrate abusive
mentality. Absurd, right? The writers are unsung heroes and sympathetic
alcoholics. The military leaders are inspirational because they are ignorant of
the true reasons for war. They are just doing their jobs. This basically sets
up the rest of the story where even though the characters, points of view, and
plots change everyone is just doing what they’ve always done. What they’re
supposed to do.
The second and third sections reinforces the sensation of
chaos by altering the formal rules, casts, and settings. This works to shift
the ground beneath readers. The absurdism of the second section comes from some
surreal dream communication and telepathy within a traditionally rational,
empirical profession of detective work. The absurdism in the third section is the
most pronounced: the ancient city of Babylon is a contemporary place that one
could conceivably visit. However, the laws of murder, business, and literature
are bizarrely linked in the city’s infrastructure.
Throughout the book, the seemingly chaotic and unruly form
is actually highly restricted. Just as the margins are pressing the parameters
of the page into tight, square boxes, the angle of the story and the
information being pumped into the public is all restricted and edited before it
is broadcast for consumption. Everything is viewed through the lenses of the
criminal characters, the journalists, the film crew, the television screens. Accordingly,
the brutally focused reporter Sheryl is the only character that transcends all
sections of the book. With everything being so heavily filtered and controlled,
the chaotic nonsensical messages that are actually carefully crafted.
Although there are incredibly intricate formal and thematic
elements one could explore for days, I am giving this book 3 stars due to a few
significantly restring features. First of all, the initial section is strewn
with physical and psychological abuse of women—including a truly triggering
rape scene. Although, as I mentioned before, I do believe that is constructed
to move forth an ideological absurdism on which to base the book, it was very
hard to read. I would assign it an explicit trigger warning. Beyond that, this
book will appeal to an audience with very specific stylistic tastes for
experimental literature. You really shouldn’t approach this book looking for a
straightforward narrative plot or if you like to maintain your personal comfort.
Kelsey Lueptow is a mumma-writer at Diary of a First Time
Mom and a graduate student at Northern Michigan University.
No comments:
Post a Comment